we power mobile payments

Mobile Remittance – the new disrupter of global money transfer

Posted on Oct 24, 2013

Mobile Remittance – the new disrupter of global money transfer

A quite, disruptive revolution is slowly taking place across the globe – mobile international remittance.

The concept of remittance has been around since the beginning of civilization. Throughout history, family members have worked away from where they live and sent money back home to their family. What has changed dramatically now is they way in which these funds are sent and received – by mobile phone.

Remittance – the sending of money to friends and family back home – has long been the domain of the giant Money Transfer Organisations (MTO’s) such as Western Union and Moneygram. To a lesser degree the banking sector has also participated in this industry although for regular remittance, their association has been limited as we shall see below.

International remittance, the sending of money internationally, can be separated into three pillars: 1) banks (don’t serve the unbanked), 2) MTOs (slow and have high fees), and now 3) mobile international remittance operators (cheap, easy and designed for unbanked).

There are several factors which have disrupted traditional international remittance, why mobile remittance is successful and why it will likely eventually dominate. A combination of need, solutions, and service providers are naturally aligning to produce a perfect storm in this sector.

money flows from rich to poor countries

Most remittance flows are usually from richer to poorer counties. The real value of money and earning power in rich countries is also far greater than that in poor countries which means that what may seem a small amount of money in a sending country (e.g. USD 100) goes a long way when sent to Africa for example. The high number of bank accounts in rich countries, coupled with easy electronic mobile and online payment options means senders in rich countries now have a greater choice of sending methods.

poor countries have large numbers of unbanked

The low number of bank accounts in poor countries means that it has always been difficult to have money sent directly to end recipients. This effectively means bank participation in international remittance has been and will continue to be limited. Instead, recipients have traditionally relied on MTO’s and their affiliated agent networks at both the sender and receiver ends where over-the-counter cash-in and cash-out points are used.

mobile money operators are the channel for terminating funds

The expansion of mobile money services in poor countries means that for the first time there is now a viable and very simple way of personally addressing (or routing) payment directly to an end recipient – via their mobile number. This can eliminate the need for banks and potentially also reduces significantly the reliance on MTOs. While to some degree the same MTO agents are still used as cash-out points, reliance on these will reduce as funds can be spent electronically within the receiving mobile money ecosystem without the need to cash out.

instantaneous transfer

Mobile international remittance requires trusted and complex integration of participating sending and receiving remittance partners. Their systems use real-time transaction processing platforms, which mean funds can be transferred instantaneously – faster than many banking systems operate.

much lower transaction costs

Real-time transaction processing means operating costs are lower which can in turn be passed on to end users in the form of lower transaction fees. The World Bank estimates that reducing remittance fees by 2-5% could increase the flow of formal remittances by 50-70%. Reducing the cost of sending each individual remittance encourages the delivery of lower value remittances, at values far less than today’s average transfer of US$200.

fraud and AML

Fraud is constant concern for international remittance. However, there is a strong argument that because mobile international remittance services operate electronically, they are inherently more secure than traditional MTOs which in some cases still employ manual processes at the agent level which are vulnerable to fraud – particularly at cash-in and cash-out points. Furthermore, real-time electronic systems have the ability to impose transaction limits, automatically block, flag or report suspicious transactions and identify transaction patterns in the movement of money.

regulatory issues

This new paradigm created by international mobile money means that in many markets, regulation has not caught up with services in the market. In some cases, regulators have opted to block or severely restrict the operation of mobile money and also mobile international remittance for fear of loosing control of the financial system. While understandable, this approach is largely unwarranted and potentially damaging to an economy. Evidence has shown that proactive involvement and participation by the regulators to encourage these services is far more successful that a fear and ignorance driven protectionist approach which has the effect of paralyzing the sector and stifling innovation.

For an interesting perspective on this issue and other related mobile money matters see the Jonathan Greenacre paper: The Rise of Mobile Money.

case study – mHITs Remit

The mHITs Remit service is once the first mobile international remittance services in the world. mHITs (pronounced Em-HITS) is a leading Australian based developer and operator of mobile payment services. In Australia, mHITs operates the mHITs SMS payment service that allows consumers to send and receive payments by SMS text message.

The mHITs Remit service allows funds to be sent instantly from Australia to mobile money counterpart operators in selected overseas markets. Sending fees are significantly lower than traditional methods due to the reasons mentioned earlier.

Corridors and mobile money operators connected to the service include M-PESA Kenya, Globe GCash and SMART Money in the Philippines, MTN Money in Ghana, Telesom ZAAD in Somaliland and eSewa in Nepal. Future corridors will include M-PAiSA Fiji, Airtel Money DRC and MTN Money Ivory Coast.

For more information on the mHITs Remit service see http://www.mhits.com.au/send-money


Apple iTunes – the world’s largest mobile payment ecosystem

Posted on May 30, 2013

Technically, Apple operates the largest mobile payment ecosystem in the world – iTunes. Linked to debit and credit card accounts, at latest count Apple have almost half a billion iTunes “users” and while not all accounts are linked to a mobile device, it still represents a significant proportion of the population of the planet.  Through the iTunes ecosystem, users can purchase music, videos, books, apps, digital content, game credits and other digital goods and services through in-app purchases. Classifying iTunes as a mobile payment...

What is a mobile wallet?

Posted on Apr 29, 2013

What is a mobile wallet?

Recent posts and articles in social media have posed the question: Who will win the “Mobile Wallet Wars”? Challengers include Google Wallet, Square, PayPal, VISA, ISIS, MasterCard etc. Ironically many of these services are US based which reflects the often one-eyed, myopic, US-centric, the-world-revolves-around-my-solution attitude in these debates. Mobile wallets mean very different things to different people, giving rise to confusion and miss-information on this topic. Broad-brush and overlapping references across multiple markets each...

Is NFC Not For (mobile) Commerce?

Posted on Mar 17, 2013

Is NFC Not For (mobile) Commerce?

Much has been written about NFC or Near Field Communications.  Indeed the technology itself has been in existence for nearly 10 years now in various applications.  NFC is a class of communications within what is known as RFID (radio-frequency identification) and was designed to allow short-range two-way wireless data communications between devices.  Cleverly, NFC is designed for use with passive devices – devices that do not require a power source or a battery to operate.  This makes it an ideal technology for use in credit and debit...

What makes a payment mobile? (part 2 of 2)

Posted on Feb 12, 2013

What makes a payment mobile? (part 2 of 2)

This is part 2 of a 2 part topic.  To read part 1 click here. In part 1 we talked about how mobile payments mean different things to different people in different markets.  We will expand on this further here.   Does simply initiating a payment instruction from a portable device classify it as a mobile payment?  If I use Internet Banking on my laptop in a café does this automatically make it a mobile payment transaction?  What if I perform the same transaction using my tablet using a WiFi connection?  What if I use telephone banking...